is-ness

Believers can trace cause and prediction from early religious writings.

Those on spiritual paths are guided by tuning into a universal harmony.

Rule followers rely on precedent and law to assess current deviations.

Artists have insights which they reveal in their styles and works.

Meditators calmly observe themselves, or a mandala, or chant to still their thoughts.

Scientists now say that the rational is only a part of the mind, that there are non-conscious inputs to decision making.

Consciousness is becoming more sophisticated, providing sharper observations and more complex explanations.

I'm wondering if all the explanations are conceits, category errors with insufficient distance.

I'm wanting to say none of the above. It all just is, and the pattern-loving mind is a trickster.